History books are difficult to write because it takes meticulous effort to gather the facts, verify them and piece them together to present a plausible story. It is always great if a piece of text from that era was found. This would possibly authenticate the story. However, there are those who try to rewrite history due to their need to change something that is not acceptable, or build something to support their agenda. But two things are for sure, you cannot deny the fact that Jesus was born and that it was prophesied more than 700 years before He was born. Which is harder to write? A prophecy (that became fulfilled) or a history text?
Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Though you are little among the thousands of Judah, Yet out of you shall come forth to Me The One to be Ruler in Israel, Whose goings forth are from of old, From everlasting.”
Yes, Bethlehem is mentioned as the place of the coming of the "Ruler of Israel". And we know that Jesus was born in Bethlehem about 700 years later. For a fuller view of this prophesy do read the entire chapter. The part that throws most people off is that it says He will destroy Israel's enemies. There is no contradiction. He is returning as mentioned in Revelations. There will be judgement. But there is a space of time to repent and be reconciled to God through His death and resurrection, before the judgement comes. Don't wait. Do it now.
Father, thank you for Your salvation plan prepared before the beginning.
Comments
Post a Comment